Sony RX10 V Is Finally Here After 9 Years — But Photographers May Be Disappointed


Sony RX10 V camera concept featuring a large Zeiss zoom lens and premium black camera body.


Sony just ended one of the longest waits in camera history. The RX10 IV built a devoted following back in 2017 and never got a proper successor — until this week. The new RX10 V finally showed up, and after a wave of hands-on reviews, the verdict is oddly split: this might be the best video camera in its class, while its actual photos still leave something to be desired.

Let's start with the number that's going to make people wince: $2,299.99. That's Sony's asking price for the RX10 V, a fixed-lens bridge camera announced on July 9, 2026, arriving nearly nine years after the RX10 IV first launched back in 2017 at $1,800. For context, that's more than some full-frame mirrorless bodies with an actual lens included. And this camera comes with exactly one lens, permanently attached, that you can never swap out. 

So the real question isn't whether Sony built something impressive. Early reviews agree it clearly did. The real question is whether "impressive" is enough to justify a price tag this steep, on a camera whose still-photo performance apparently still shows its age in a few key moments.


What Actually Makes This Camera Special

The RX10 series has always had one job: give you an absurd zoom range in a single body, without forcing you to lug around three or four separate lenses. The RX10 V keeps that exact promise. It's built around a Zeiss Vario-Sonnar 24-600mm equivalent lens, covering a full 25x zoom range, with an aperture that starts at f/2.4 on the wide end and narrows to f/4 once you're fully zoomed in. That's the same core lens spec as the RX10 IV before it. Nothing new there. What's actually new is basically everything wrapped around it. Sony dropped in its BIONZ XR processor paired with a dedicated AI processing chip, both borrowed from its current Alpha mirrorless lineup. 

That combination brings real subject-recognition autofocus to a bridge camera for the first time — tracking birds, animals, cars, planes, and even human pose estimation that can keep following a person even when their face isn't visible to the camera. The processing boost also unlocks 30 frames per second burst shooting with a blackout-free viewfinder, meaning you can track fast-moving subjects without the image freezing between frames the way older bridge cameras always did.


The Design Grew Up, and Reviewers Genuinely Like It

Here's a detail almost every review agrees on: the RX10 V doesn't look or feel like its predecessor anymore, and that's a compliment. The RX10 IV always had a slightly dated, compact-camera feel to its body, even back when it launched. The RX10 V ditches that entirely for a squared-off design that borrows heavily from Sony's current Alpha camera line, including its newest A7R VI. 

Reviewers specifically called out the addition of a joystick for autofocus point selection, something bridge camera shooters have been asking Sony for, alongside a larger, higher-resolution viewfinder, additional exposure dials, and a proper USB-C port. The grip also got noticeably bigger, which turns out to matter for a very practical reason: it now houses Sony's larger Z-series battery, delivering a claimed 50 percent boost in battery life over the older W-series battery used in the RX10 IV. 

Early hands-on testers reported burning through only a small fraction of a full charge after a day of heavy shooting, including burst sequences. Not everything about the redesign is a pure win, though. The weather-resistant body loses a couple of things the RX10 IV actually had, including a built-in flash and a top status LCD, trade-offs that some longtime RX10 shooters may not be thrilled about losing.


Where Reviewers Say It Genuinely Struggles

This is the part of the story that keeps this from being a clean, universal rave, and it's worth taking seriously rather than glossing over. One detailed hands-on review found that image quality holds up fine at low ISO settings, with JPEG files looking entirely satisfactory in good light. But push into more demanding conditions, and the cracks start to show. At ISO 800, that same reviewer noted visible image quality degradation. Push further to ISO 1600 or 3200 — genuinely normal settings for plenty of everyday shooting in 2026 — and the camera reportedly struggles more than you'd expect from a brand-new release at this price point, with noise reduction in JPEGs coming across as heavy-handed rather than well-balanced. 

That's a meaningful critique, because the RX10 V is still built around a 1-inch sensor, the same sensor size category as its 2017 predecessor. A 1-inch sensor was reasonably competitive nearly a decade ago. Against modern mirrorless cameras with larger APS-C or full-frame sensors, low-light performance was always going to be the RX10 V's toughest test, and it's apparently the one area where nearly nine years of processing improvements couldn't fully close the gap. There's also a lens quirk worth knowing about if you're expecting that bright f/2.4 aperture to stick around through your zoom range. One hands-on tester noted the aperture actually starts narrowing almost immediately past the widest 25mm setting, well before you're anywhere close to full zoom.


Where It Genuinely Shines: Video

Here's the flip side of this story, and it's a big one. Multiple reviewers independently landed on the same conclusion: whatever hesitation they had about still-photo performance basically evaporates the moment you look at what the RX10 V can do with video. The camera handles uncropped 4K video at 60 frames per second using the sensor's full width with no crop, and it can push to 4K at 120 frames per second for genuinely smooth slow-motion footage, with a modest sensor crop at that higher frame rate. 

It supports 10-bit 4:2:2 color in All-Intra encoding, alongside Sony's S-Cinetone color profile for footage that looks cinematic straight out of the camera without any grading, and S-Log3 for shooters who want maximum flexibility in post-production color work. Up to 16 custom LUTs can be loaded directly onto the camera as well. One reviewer put it about as directly as you can: for video specifically, this is the best camera in its class by a wide margin, and one of the more well-rounded video tools available at any price point in the bridge camera category right now.


So Who Should Actually Buy This?

Strip away the marketing, and the RX10 V ends up being a genuinely narrow recommendation, even according to the reviewers who liked it. If you're a wildlife, birding, or sports shooter who needs an enormous zoom range without hauling around multiple lenses, and video quality matters as much to you as stills, the case for the RX10 V is strong. 

The autofocus, burst speed, and video specs genuinely deliver on nearly a decade of accumulated camera technology arriving all at once. If your priority is squeezing the absolute best possible low-light photo quality out of every dollar you spend, most reviewers agree you're better served putting that same $2,300 toward a mirrorless body and a dedicated superzoom lens, even if it means carrying more gear and losing some of the RX10 V's effortless one-body simplicity. And if raw focal range is genuinely your only priority, cheaper bridge cameras exist that will get you a bigger numerical zoom for meaningfully less money, just without the RX10 V's video chops or premium build quality attached.


The Bottom Line

Nine years is an unusually long wait for any camera successor, and the RX10 V mostly justifies it. The redesign is a real upgrade, the autofocus system is a genuine leap forward, and the video capabilities alone might be worth the price for the right shooter. But "the best in its category" and "genuinely excellent in every condition" turned out to be two different claims this time around. If demanding low-light stills are a regular part of what you shoot, this is a camera worth testing in person before you commit $2,300 to it, rather than assuming nine years of waiting automatically solved every problem along the way.


Also read: Google Storage Suddenly Filling Up? Android Backups Now Count Against Your 15GB Limit

Popular posts from this blog

Don't Ignore This Green Camera Icon on Android — It Could Reveal Hidden App Activity

iPhone 17 Price Hike Rumors: Here's Why Prices Could Go Up

ChatGPT Image Generation Failed— Here's What's Happening and What Actually Works